Testseek.es han recogido 74 las revisiones expertas de el Dyson 360 Eye y el grado medio es el 79%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Dyson 360 Eye.
July 2016
(79%)
74 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(68%)
154 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
79010074
A los editores les gusta
A los editores no les gusta
Autonomía de 40 minutos
App con opciones escasas
Críticas
página 3 de 8
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
Publicación: 2017-06-01, Autor: Judie , crítica de: geardiary.com
Ability to schedule a set time each day for the robot to clean, It's less wide than most other robot vacs, so it can get in narrower spaces, You can start an unscheduled cleaning at any time through the app, Battery lasts more than long enough to clean my
It's very expensive; It won't work well on carpets with fringe or thin carpets; Its powerful suction can attach itself to loose cables or wires (so keep them out of the way); It may not be able to get under lower furniture due to its height
Publicación: 2017-05-05, Autor: Victoria , crítica de: pcmag.com
Powerful cleaning abilities, Accurate navigation thanks to 360-degree camera, Can be controlled by multiple phones, Scheduled cleaning through app
Very expensive, Can't clean under low furniture or in tight corners, Battery life could be longer
The Dyson 360 Eye is the one of the best robot vacuums you can buy thanks to its impressive cleaning and navigation abilities, but you can find similarly equipped alternatives for less money...
Resumen: Robot vacuums are becoming more and more common, and with that increasing popularity comes an increase in competition. There are quite a few big names in the vacuum industry, but not many are as well known as iRobot or Dyson, the latter of which fairly re...
Dyson has put together a great product, but it's got some big flaws that might seriously affect whether or not you purchase it. For starters it has the highest price tag among consumer-grade robot vacuums, putting it $100 higher than the iRobot Roomba 980...
Publicación: 2016-10-05, Autor: Chris , crítica de: slashgear.com
Excellent cleaning, Compact footprint more nimble around chair legs, App is straightforward and summaries are useful, Potential for firmware to address shortcomings
Very expensive, Tank tracks aren't infallible, Edge performance can be hit and miss, No way to block off zones or no-go areas
Publicación: 2016-08-23, Autor: Anthony , crítica de: geekdad.com
Resumen: Last year, I sent my trusty old bumper-car of a Roomba to that scrap heap in the sky It had served my family well, but the Neato Botvac D80 had claimed its spot as the defeater of dust bunnies in our house It was obedient, intelligent, and, when it wasn't...
Publicación: 2016-07-27, Autor: Andrew , crítica de: gizmodo.com
Resumen: GIF All images: Andrew Liszewski/Gizmodo You'd think that the first robot vacuum from a company like Dyson , who reinvented the vacuum , fan , and hair dryer , would riv...
Dyson's 360 Eye robot vacuum systematically maps out floors, has a simple companion app for remote access, and is powerful enough to collect a lot of unwanted dirt and grime
It costs $999/£800 and didn't perform as well as the similarly app-enabled $700 Neato Botvac Connected or the $900 iRobot Roomba 980
The 360 Eye by Dyson is a very good robot vacuum, but competitors offer similar features and better performance for less...
Resumen: People have been talking about robots for decades now. You have probably seen a few movies where robots are helping people in doing simple tasks. In some movies you could actually see robots doing everything while humans rest and socialize. While this sou...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(100%)
Publicación: 2014-01-23, Autor: Jill , crítica de: tomsguide.com
Resumen: The mop pads attach to the robot's underbelly, just behind the vacuum opening and two sweepers. The device can also carry up to 6 ounces of water, which it uses to dampen the mop pads as it works.Like many other vacuum robots, the H68 scans the room it's ...
