Testseek.es han recogido 62 las revisiones expertas de el Netgear R6300 WiFi Router 802.11ac Dual Band Gigabit y el grado medio es el 83%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Netgear R6300 WiFi Router 802.11ac Dual Band Gigabit.
July 2013
(83%)
62 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
83010062
Críticas
página 3 de 7
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
Publicación: 2012-07-05, Autor: Samara , crítica de: pcmag.com
Genie software provides easy setup and management. Supports draft 802.11ac. Dual USB ports. Very good performance in 2.4 GHz N-only mode. IPv6 support. Runs cool.
Bizarre design that limits placement. Performance not on par with other Netgear dual-bands. No USB 3.0
Although the Netgear R6300 supports the latest 802.11ac standard (in draft form); an odd design, and surprisingly underwhelming performance running in 11ac mode does not make this router one of Netgear's best....
Publicación: 2012-06-27, Autor: Dong , crítica de: cnet.com
The Netgear R6300 WiFi Router supports 802.11ac and offers superb performance. It has a nice mobile-app-enabled Web interface that's easy to use
The Netgear R6300 WiFi Router is bulky. Its mobile app only works within the local network and the performance of its network storage and 2.4GHz Wi-Fi band could be better
The Netgear R6300 WiFi Router is for a high-standards, low-ego type of user: it's not something you can show off aesthetically, but a powerhouse for a robust, fast home network, both for now and tomorrow.
Publicación: 2013-08-28, Autor: Neil , crítica de: techradar.com/au/
Good 802.11ac speeds, Excellent 802.11n speeds, 4x Gigabit LAN ports, Comprehensive features, Easy to install
Awkward port placement, Tricky bridge settings, Interface needs polish, Still pricey
You might also like... How to speed up your wireless network How to secure a wireless network How to build the ultimate home media network The Buffalo AirStation 1750 was easy to dismiss, with its uninspiring 802.11ac performance. This Netgear R6300 is a...
Super-fast Wi-Fi, Good USB sharing performance, Very reliable performer
Needs 802.11ac adapters to work best, Hardware design a little awkward, Parental filters not the easiest to set up
Netgear's R6300 is a cream-of-the-crop dual-band wireless router that supports the 802.11ac standard. It's a great overall unit that will work well in any networking environment. Team it up with client devices that support 802.11ac, and it will supply wir...
Excellent user interface. Includes 802.11ac Wi-Fi. Good performance at close to medium range
Lucklustre long range performance. Limited 802.11ac device support at this stage
The R6300 is quite a beast of a router, and it certainly gives a promise of things to come. While we score it highly, we'd hold off on purchasing anything 802.11ac until client chips are more widespread — by then, there'll likely be something even bett...
Resumen: Netgear is the latest early-adopter of the in-development 802.11ac standard, which is intended to provide throughput of at least one gigabit per second. That’s almost double the maximum throughput of 802.11n, the highest-speed Wi-Fi standard that’s be...
Genie software provides easy setup and management, Supports draft 802,11ac, Dual USB ports, Very good performance in 2,4 GHz N-only mode, IPv6 support, Runs cool
Bizarre design that limits placement, Performance not on par with other Netgear dual-bands, No USB 3,0
Although the Netgear R6300 supports the latest 802.11ac standard (in draft form); an odd design, and surprisingly underwhelming performance running in 11ac mode does not make this router one of Netgear's best...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(60%)
Publicación: 2012-12-10, Autor: JeeYee , crítica de: chip.com.my
Great 5GHz performance, Dualband, 802.11ac support, Easy to use
2.4GHz output isn't very good, Bulky design
The NETGEAR R6300 router has speedy performances, in both of its 802.11ac and 802.11n bands, so if you're planning to upgrade to 5G Wi-Fi, the R6300 is not a bad choice. Just make sure you have a place to fit it in, however.(previously published in issue...
