Testseek.es han recogido 92 las revisiones expertas de el Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX500 Series SATA600 y el grado medio es el 74%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX500 Series SATA600.
July 2019
(74%)
92 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(95%)
24 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
Great Performance, SATA 6 Compliant, 96-Layer 3D NAND, Available in Sizes up to 960GB, More Storage Less Cost, Included Imaging Software
TLC NAND, Wear rates are pretty high
In this review we took a look at the Crucial BX500 SATA SSD. The BX series is an interesting line from Crucial as they have taken a different approach to how SSD drives are built and sold. On the surface they appear to be more affordable however when you...
Publicación: 2019-02-21, Autor: Bartosz , crítica de: funkykit.com
High performance to price ratio, Inexpensive, High compatibility, Momentum Cache, 3-year warranty
Performance in random operations could be higher,
Crucial BX500 is a great option if we are considering an upgrade from an HDD to SSD but we don't have a high budget. Especially 960GB version is interesting if we are using a laptop which supports only one drive and we still have more data.A refreshed lin...
Publicación: 2019-02-20, Autor: Chris , crítica de: pcmag.com
On-point testing results for a value-minded SATA drive, Four capacities to choose among, Comprehensive drive dashboard,
Three-year, versus five-year, warranty, Lower "total writes" rating than competing drives from Crucial, Few ancillary features
The Crucial BX500 is a solid, budget-friendly 2.5-inch SATA SSD with a value bent, but at our test capacity, the company's own MX500 is a better choice for most...
Publicación: 2019-02-05, Autor: Alex , crítica de: modders-inc.com
Resumen: Crucial has been into memory and SSD business for a long time. Their most affordable line of performance SSDs is labeled as “BX”. Crucial's latest addition to the BX line is BX500. BX500 Is a 2.5” based SATA SSD that is offered in multiple capacities star...
Lower than average application performance, Low endurance, Low sustained write performance
Crucial's BX500 is a cheap option that will outperform any HDD as a boot drive, but it comes with drawbacks. The BX500's low endurance and application performance rank far behind most current-gen SSDs in the market. Pricing is competitive, but there are m...
Resumen: Crucial has updated their packaging, it's smaller in size, you don't see the drive at the front, but still it looks elegant, plus you have all the necessary information about the drive. I like this new design.The front of the box.The back of the box.After...
Publicación: 2018-12-07, Autor: Bartosz , crítica de: funkykit.com
High performance to price ratio, Inexpensive, High compatibility, Momentum Cache, 3-year warranty
Nothing worth to mention,
Crucial BX500 480GB should satisfy all users who are moving from a standard HDD to SSD. The BX500 proves that SSD doesn't have to be expensive to make its work right. Especially home and office users will see the difference, and considering the requiremen...
Publicación: 2018-11-12, Autor: Jeff , crítica de: venturebeat.com
Resumen: Right now is a great time to buy storage for your PC. Flash memory-based SSDs are dirt cheap at the moment, as the price of NAND continues to drop. So, where does that leave a company like Crucial that wants to introduce a new entry-level SATA SSD, as wel...
Publicación: 2018-11-10, Autor: HP , crítica de: relaxedtech.com
Great Sequential Read/Write Speeds, Free Acronis True Image Software, Significantly Faster Than a HDD, Highly Affordable, Three-Years Warranty
Low Random Write Speeds, Limited To 480GB Max Capacity, Crucial's SSDs have always been competitively priced compared to the competition and the BX500 is no exception. At $80, the BX500 480GB is affordable but not by much compared to the MX500 500GB whic
I believe the Crucial BX500 480GB SSD deserves our Great Value award.Final Score 9.0« Home Page »Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. comments powered by Disqus...