Testseek.es han recogido 94 las revisiones expertas de el OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600 y el grado medio es el 80%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para OCZ 2.5 inch Octane Series SATA600.
December 2011
(80%)
94 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
80010094
A los editores les gusta
Interfaz SATA 6 Gbps
Bajo consumo
Calor generado y ruido
Alta tasa de lectura
Precio ajustado
A los editores no les gusta
La tasa de escritura podría mejorar respecto a la de lectura
While we'd hoped for a return to form for Indilinx, its new Everest drive controller lags behind the competition when it comes to performance. The new v1.13 firmware sees the OCZ Octane 512GB deliver sequential and random speeds notably slower than those...
Publicación: 2012-01-30, Autor: Kevin , crítica de: storagereview.com
OCZ leveraged the benefit of owning their own controller to quickly roll out an update to their Octane line of SSDs that optimized their performance for 4K writes. OCZ easily accomplished that goal, driving an increase of 138% in the 128GB model and a gai...
Silky smooth operation as a system drive, Excellent sequential reading and writing performance, Very good 4K random I/O performance at low queue depths, SATA 6Gbps support, TRIM support under Windows 7, Lightning fast access times, Completely silent
Writing speeds do not scale very well when queue depths rise.
Let us summarise the most important positive and negative points belowPositiveSilky smooth operation as a system drive.Excellent sequential reading and writing performance.Very good 4K random I/O performance at low queue depths.SATA 6Gbps support.TRIM sup...
Publicación: 2012-01-17, Autor: Jake , crítica de: pureoverclock.com
As we've said before and we'll continue to preach at any opportunity we get, the biggest bottleneck in modern systems is the traditional plattered hard drive; after using an SSD in your system you'll wonder how you ever survived without one previously....
I'm still trying to get my hands on smaller capacities of other newer SSDs to add them to our growing database of SSD performance data. For now it looks like the Octane is a good solution for typical desktop users, even at its 128GB capacity. Performance...
The Indilinx processor gives OCZ a huge advantage in both cost savings and SSD reliability. When we look at the smaller 128GB Octane compared to the 512GB bigger brother, the 128's read speeds actually hold up very well. Per the spec sheet though and ...
The first SSD with Indilinx Controller after it was bought by OCZ is impressive. The performance convinces and is top in many categories. Just the 4K write performance could be better. Poorly compressible data are no problem for the Octane - contrary to c...
Publicación: 2011-12-07, Autor: Joe , crítica de: legitreviews.com
Now that OCZ has resurrected Indilinx with the Everest controller, the industry better take note because they've put together a splendid line of drives with Octane series and we get the feeling that they're just getting warmed up....
The encouraging fright factor is massive with the Octane series SSD, seriously once we popped it in to our test setup it just felt good in every way and sense. SandForce 2000 controllers haul ass in uncompressed files, Indilinx hauls ass when it comes to...
