Testseek.es han recogido 230 las revisiones expertas de el Samsung 2.5 inch 850 Evo Series SATA600 y el grado medio es el 89%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Samsung 2.5 inch 850 Evo Series SATA600.
December 2014
(89%)
230 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(93%)
11674 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
Publicación: 2014-12-08, Autor: Gavin , crítica de: play3r.net
– 5 year warranty, Mediocre:, The technology is “top end” but limited by the SATA3 (6GB/s) interface
Bit too expensive to “compete” with other brands, – Not much of a jump “if any” from the original 840 EVO
Specifically today, I will be taking a look at the Samsung 850 EVO 250GB drive which is the sweet spot in my opinion for an operating system with enough room for programmes/applications as well as a couple of games. The 850 EVO features Samsung's 32 laye...
Publicación: 2014-12-08, Autor: Phil , crítica de: techteamgb.co.uk
One of the strongest performing consumer SSDs out there. Looks the part, and performs comparably to current prosumer SSDs, albeit in a consumer price bracket. We highly recommend this for anyone looking for the best price to perfomance ratio!
Build Quality / Endurance (150TBW / 1 Million Hours MTBF), Excellent Overall Performance, Features (TurboWrite/RAPID Mode/eDrive Support), Samsung Magician Software, 5 Year Warranty, Available In 1TB, ,
Price (For Some),
After we reviewed the 850 Pro 512GB model and heard that Samsung would also send us the 850 EVO 500GB we thought that there would be a sufficient performance gap between those two to "justify" both the different target areas and the differen...
Publicación: 2017-12-02, Autor: Billy , crítica de: anandtech.com
There are few options for a decent 120GB class SSD in today's market. For the most part, modern NAND flash chips have simply outgrown this market segment. Entry-level drives are almost always based on TLC NAND, and that means relatively few high-capacity...
Publicación: 2017-11-27, Autor: Chris , crítica de: tomshardware.com
Samsung SATA (high) performance, Low cost, Support for Magician and Rapid Mode
Limited availability, Single and low capacity (at the time of writing), Reduced warranty compared to 850 EVO
The 850 only has a three-year warranty, so it's downstream from the 850 EVO, but that doesn't mean it's a replacement for the 650 or 750 EVO. The 850's performance is very high for the 128GB-class, but that's standard issue for Samsung SSDs. N/A -...
Publicación: 2016-11-30, Autor: Josh , crítica de: pcmag.com
Gigantic capacity, Relatively affordable (given its size), Excellent performance for a SATA drive,
You may need a loan to buy one, Slower than previous model in certain minor test scenarios
Today's biggest-capacity consumer SSD, the 4TB version of the venerable 850 EVO packs the same speed and delivers the same strengths as Samsung's earlier models, but the price is quite dear...
Gigantic capacity, Relatively affordable (given its size), Excellent performance for a SATA drive
You may need a loan to buy one, Slower than previous model in certain minor test scenarios
Today's biggest-capacity consumer SSD, the 4TB version of the venerable 850 EVO packs the same speed and delivers the same strengths as Samsung's earlier models, but the price is quite dear. Read More…...
In the past few years, Samsung has been the dominant force in SSD technology and with the introduction of the Samsung 850 EVO 4TB, Samsung continues their leadership in the space. While I don't see a whole lot of people dropping the significant amount of...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
Premio
-
Publicación: 2016-07-12, Autor: Allyn , crítica de: pcper.com
Best in class performance (even outperforms competing MLC parts!), Performance oddities seen in the 2TB model are not present in 4TB, Best SATA performance in our new Mixed Burst testing
As the SSD drum beats on, folks want higher and higher capacities. Samsung has answered the call with their 4TB 850 EVO. 48-layer V-NAND enables even higher densities, meaning the move from 2TB could be accomplished with the same die count and a bit more...
