Testseek.es han recogido 162 las revisiones expertas de el AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe y el grado medio es el 82%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
September 2015
(82%)
162 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
Publicación: 2015-09-17, Autor: W1zzard , crítica de: techpowerup.com
Extremely compact, Power efficient, Dual BIOS, Support for AMD FreeSync, Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control
Very expensive, No HDMI 2.0 support, Coil noise, Average clock speed well below advertised 1000 MHz, Fan doesn't turn off in idle, Complicated overclocking, No backplate
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is available online for $650. Extremely compact Power efficient Dual BIOS Support for AMD FreeSync Supports AMD Virtual Super Resolution and Framerate Target Control Very expensive No HDMI 2.0 support Coil noise Average clock speed...
So there you have it, the Radeon R9 Nano is slightly slower than the Fury which is slightly slower than the Fury X.First let's break down the results from the 16 games that were tested.The Nano was on average 6% slower than the Fury at both 1600p and 4K...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2015-09-10, Autor: Nathan , crítica de: legitreviews.com
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an impressive video card in that you get an astonishing amount of performance with all the flagship GPU features in a six inch form factor. The AMD Radeon R9 Nano won't be winning at price versus performance charts, but we feel t...
Despite the small amount of benchmarks, it looks like AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano.This pint-sized powerhouse is based on revolutionarily tiny - and fast - high-bandwidth memory to deliver flagship-level performance...
Resumen: And it's easy to explain why: a quick look at the Fiji block diagram illustrates the chip's four shader engines, similar to Hawaii's configuration. Each has its own geometry processor and rasterizer, as well as four render back ends that can process up to...
Publicación: 2015-09-10, Autor: Hilbert , crítica de: guru3d.com
The Nano is an impressive product, to see something perform so well at a form factor of 15cm is impressive. That said it isn't perfect with the HDMI 2.0 limitation and airflow dependency relative to noise. But if you get airflow under control in a clos...
Exceptionally powerful for a 6-inch, air-cooled card, Easily outperforms any similarly sized Nvidia card currently available
Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti perform better overall for about the same price, Lack of HDMI 2.0 support makes the card a tricky fit for gaming on a 4K HDTV
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and that you're paying a major premium for that fact. Read More…...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
Premio
(80%)
Publicación: 2015-09-10, Autor: Marco , crítica de: hothardware.com
Good Performance, Tiny Form Factor, Cool and Quiet, Power Efficient (Relatively Speaking)
Not Quite As Fast As A Fury, Premium Pricing, Inductor Noise, No HDMI 2.0
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - Find It At AmazonAMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly more manageable than ot...
Publicación: 2015-09-10, Autor: Steven , crítica de: techspot.com
Measuring a mere 6" long, the R9 Nano brings 4K gaming performance to cases where the Fury X can't fit and it exceeds the GTX 980 Ti in efficiency.
For the same $650, the GTX 980 Ti and R9 Fury X are a bit faster. Coil noise is an issue on our sample and on high the fan isn't particularly quiet either. It is 2015 where is the HDMI 2.0 support?
