Testseek.es han recogido 277 las revisiones expertas de el AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4 y el grado medio es el 80%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD Ryzen 5 1500X 3.5GHz Socket AM4.
April 2017
(80%)
277 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
800100277
A los editores les gusta
Va bien para juegos en full hd
Capacidad de overclock
AplicaciÓn amd master ryzen
Incorpora disipador de serie
A los editores no les gusta
EsperÁbamos un mayor rendimiento
Consumo y temperaturas son mejorables
No permite tanto overclock como el 1600x o el 1700
No permite tanto overclock como el 1600x o el
Críticas
página 6 de 28
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Nathan , crítica de: legitreviews.com
The AMD Ryzen 5 processor launch is very similar feel to the Ryzen 7 launch as the multi-threaded performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X and 1500X were most impressive. Single threaded workloads or very lightly threaded workloads still run better on Intel h...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: ATMINSIDE , crítica de: overclockers.com
Well, the performance is pleasantly surprising. The 1500X, in most cases, performed on par with the i7-7700K. Even though you can overclock the i7 further, the MSRP of the Ryzen 5 1500X is only $189. That's a monstrous difference in price/performance. E...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Bruno , crítica de: reviewstudio.net
performance, overclocking, power consumption, value
AMD Ryzen 7 produced a revolution in the 8-core area, offering at least the same performance as Intel LGA2011 counterparts, but at half price. Now Ryzen 5 came to compete with LGA1151 solutions, and AMD banged Intel's head again with 1600X, a 6-core/12-th...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(95%)
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Steven , crítica de: techspot.com
Exceptional value compared to their Intel Core i5 counterparts. Ryzen holds a clear lead in productivity performance, though gaming performance is more evenly matched between Intel and AMD
Power efficiency goes right out the window once you start overclocking
Using AMD's stock coolers, the standard 1500X idled at 35 degrees and peaked at 68 degrees using the Wraith Spire. When overclocked to 3.95GHz, however, its temperatures increased to 42 degrees at idle and 88 degrees under load. That said, the heatsink wa...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Ron , crítica de: modders-inc.com
Resumen: The sub-$250 CPU price point is the sweet spot where most system builders look at for their next CPU choice. In this area, creators, gamers and casual system builders intersect and overlap with their computing needs. Intel's 4-core/4-threaded i5 processor...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: garfi3ld , crítica de: lanoc.org
Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Tom , crítica de: overclock3d.net
Resumen: Since the launch of the FX8 series of processors AMD have fallen into the sector of the market that is best described by the old "good value for money" adage, which is usually a pejorative way of saying that the performance wasn't all that but they're che...
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: Steve , crítica de: gamersnexus.net
Resumen: Following our in-depth Ryzen VR benchmark (R7 1700 vs. i7-7700K with the Rift + Vive), we immediately began compiling results for the concurrent R5 test efforts by GN Sr. Editor Patrick Lathan. Working together, we were able to knock-out the VR benchmarks...
Publicación: 2017-03-22, Autor: Steven , crítica de: techspot.com
For such a small six-game sample, those benchmarks showed quite a few interesting results. Perhaps the most exciting conclusion we can draw is that upcoming six-core Ryzen processors should perform roughly on par with eight-core models when playing today'...
Solid Multi-Core performance, 1600X is close to 1700 in performance, Both are suitable for gaming, 1600X is also a good option for content creation, New AM4 platform, wide range of motherboards available, Great Value for money at the current prices, Good
Overclocking with the Wraith coolers was limited
Ryzen 5 exceeded my expectations and the 6 core/12 thread 1600X presents a real dilemma for enthusiast gamers given how closely it performs to the Ryzen 7 1700. The 1600X will almost certainly fill the requirements of an enthusiast who games 70% of the ti...
