Testseek.es han recogido 190 las revisiones expertas de el AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2 y el grado medio es el 76%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2.
April 2014
(76%)
190 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(90%)
292 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
760100190
A los editores les gusta
Gran rendimiento de la IGP comparado con la competencia
Soporte nativo de memorias DDR3 de 2133MHz
Continúa utilizando el zócalo FM2
Gráfica Radeon HD 8000 Series
Soporte para Eyefinity e Hybrid CrossfireX
Excelente precio
Impresionante overclock y beneficio del mismo
altas frecuencias de serie y turbo
compatibilidad con las vigentes placas fm2
mejora respecto al a105800k
la mejor gráfica integrada del mercado
mismo precio que el a106700
impresionante overclock
Muy buen rendimiento gráfico
Relación prestaciones / precio
Aunque su TDP es de 100W no se calienta en exceso
Buena capacidad para el overclock
Mantiene el tipo de socket
Por lo que no es necesario cambiar todo el sistema para una actualización
Comp
A los editores no les gusta
El rendimiento de CPU es bajo comparado con los últimos CPUs de Intel.
Pocas novedades adicionales
necesidad de memorias rápidas para disfrutar de mayor fluidez gráfica
actual precio de las memorias para el mismo
pocas novedades adicionales
Pobre gestión de memoria
Poco incremento de rendimiento en CPU con respecto a la generación anterior
Publicación: 2017-04-11, Autor: garfi3ld , crítica de: lanoc.org
Well, the Ryzen 7 launch has a surprising amount of excitement and drama mixed together with the impressive numbers but with memory issues and game performance causing very polarized opinions on social media and on websites like Reddit. AMD fans even...
Resumen: After testing two of the most inexpensive processors for desktop computers (A6-6400K and the Pentium G3220), it is time for us to test two mainstream models for the same platforms: the A10-6800K and the Core i3-4150. Let's see which one is the best pick.B...
Publicación: 2013-10-07, Autor: The , crítica de: hardwarebbq.com
AMD did what they've always been doing for a while: catering to a certain niche with certain requirements that are not demand, but which ultimately makes it as a decent enough motherboard- processor combo at the end of the day. Along with the AMD A85X chi...
Publicación: 2013-09-25, Autor: Alex , crítica de: extremespec.net
AMD has just expanded its product range on the market today APU AMD Trinity. Indeed, APU AMD Richland built on the same process technology, use the same number of transistors on the same microarchitecture that we have seen in their predecessors. Perform...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2013-08-18, Autor: hassan , crítica de: wccftech.com
Resumen: In 2011, AMD released their first APU architecture codenamed “Llano” which was eventually followed by its successor “Trinity” in 2012. The Trinity APUs were met with a positive response by consumers due to the value they offered.Additionally and over the ...
Resumen: HOT! – We're Giving Away a Rosewill Throne Full Tower Chassis! (Ends July 21st, 2013) - ENTER NOW! The introduction of the original AMD FM1 APU (codenamed Llano) was an innovation because, for the first time, a CPU maker treated the on-die GPU as an im...
Resumen: A follow up to Trinity, AMD's Richland APU architecture utilizes an intelligent power management system to hit higher clock speeds without increasing power consumption.
Resumen: For those that have been wondering about AMD Richland APUs, hopefully this article provides some guidance on the CPU side. The Radeon graphics testing will be coming up in another Phoronix article for both the open-source and closed-source Catalyst ...
We last talked about AMD's A10-6800K when we were testing completely stock settings and even then we were massively impressed. When compared to its main competition, the Intel i3-3220, it matched the CPU performance in most cases whilst completely destroy...
