Testseek.es han recogido 12 las revisiones expertas de el Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 LD Di Macro 1:2 y el grado medio es el 50%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 LD Di Macro 1:2.
(50%)
12 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
Only a third of the price of some budget telephoto zooms, Decent optical performance at the short end of the zoom range, Quite light in weight for a fullframe lens,
Lacks Tamron's Vibration Correction stabiliser, Poor sharpness in the 250300mm zoom range, Basic autofocus system is very sluggish
The Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro is quite an old design and is now outclassed and outdated by most of the newer competition. It may be cheap, but it's not a particularly good buy.
Resumen: With this in mind, the existing lens is a potentially attractive choice for owners of Pentax and Sony bodies with built-in sensor-shift stabilisation, because it’s super-cheap at only £130. After all, why pay for optical stabilisation if you don’t need...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(60%)
Publicación: 2014-06-04, Autor: Kevin , crítica de: dxomark.com
Resumen: This is the second and final part of our comprehensive lens recommendations for the new entry-level Canon EOS Rebel T5 / 1200D. This time we've assessed zoom lenses from both the Canon and third party makers to see how well they perform on the camera, and...
Resumen: Regarding its extremely low price tag you cant really expect a stellar performance from the Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 LD Di macro but from a value perspective it is fairly amazing what it can give you. The resolution is very good till 200mm. At 300m...
Resumen: While there are a few standout bargains to be found, the lens world is much like the rest of life: Theres no free lunch, you tend to get what you pay for. Its thus no surprise that lenses as inexpensive as the Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 dont perform as...
Resumen: The AF17-50mm f/2.8 zoom produced numerous excellent images at all focal lengths with high sharpness, remarkable resolution of intricate detail, and snappy contrast. Even at f/2.8, central sharpness is very high at all focal lengths, a sign of superior...
Resumen: Das 70–300 ist mit 150 Euro noch ein ganzes Stück billiger als Tamrons 2,8/70-200er, muss aber ohne Stabilisator auskommen und kann vor allem bei offener Blende nicht überzeugen. Das ist jedoch die Königsdisziplin bei Lichtstärke 5,6 und effektiven 48...
Resumen: Auch die Verzeichnung von über einem Prozent ist eher ungewöhnlich. Im Vergleich zum Nikon 70–300 führt jedoch Abblenden zu ordentlichen Kontrast- und Auflösungswerten, die erst bei der längsten Brennweite abfallen. Mit 150 Euro ist das Tamron ein echt...
