Testseek.es han recogido 43 las revisiones expertas de el Sharp LC-46LE700E y el grado medio es el 75%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Sharp LC-46LE700E.
(75%)
43 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
The 700E offers a lot of screen for the money and its performance with HD sources is impressive, thanks to its ability to produce natural colours and inky black levels. However, it has a bad habit of highlighting the negative aspects of standard defin...
Resumen: Lesser issues find a few quite overt backlight inconsistencies creeping in when you view the screen from an angle, and a fairly feeble sound performance. These, though, are insignificant flaws compared wi..
The LC-40LE700 is a bit of a conundrum, excellent in some respects and rather mediocre in others. Worthy of serious consideration for any form of content that doesn't contain a great deal of fast on screen action; we would advise against this screen i...
Sharp has produced a clear winner without a doubt. Compared to previous models, the level of advancements/ improvements is quite significant. With competitive pricing, Sharp shouldn’t have any problem selling the Sharp LC46LE700E.Calibrated Settings...
Resumen: A little under a month ago I looked at and NEARLY loved the 40LE600E - the first of Sharp's new breed of budget LCD TVs with direct LED backlighting. In fact, the only big problem I had with it was its tendency to suffer with motion blur. So I'm understan...
Intense colour reproduction; good black levels; plenty of set-up flexibility; not a bad price for what's on offer
No Ethernet connection; dismal picture presets; motion isn't totally smooth; standard-definition pictures could be better; audio is rather weak
Adding 100Hz processing into the mix, Sharp's Aquos LC46LE700E certainly improves on the cheaper Aquos LC40LE600E's already good picture quality, at least as far as standard-definition material is concerned. It's just a shame the improvements aren't m...
