Testseek.es han recogido 25 las revisiones expertas de el HP Photosmart 5520 Series y el grado medio es el 69%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para HP Photosmart 5520 Series.
(69%)
25 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(68%)
14 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
69010025
Críticas
página 1 de 3
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
Publicación: 2015-05-20, Autor: Marine , crítica de: digitalversus.com
Intuitive, responsive touchscreen, Wireless printing (HP ePrint, Apple AirPrint), Userfriendly, Prints online content without need for a computer, Scan to email
Only one paper tray of 80 sheets, Ink droplets visible in prints, Low contrast in photo mode
The Photosmart 5520 has excellent value-for-money. Its ease-of-use and ability to print wirelessly from any computer or mobile device (Android and iOS) make it a liberating experience compared to some printers. It was replaced by the 5525, a similar, yet ...
Some design flaws, no additional photo tray, no PictBridge port, depth of detail isn't strong, photo paper results moderately bubbly
A nice touchscreen interface and a delicious price tag helps make the HP Photosmart 5520 e-All-in-One a contender, and its low running costs won't hurt either. Its performance is solid rather than stunning though. Share this article Find the best pr...
Publicación: 2013-01-31, Autor: Sander , crítica de: uk.hardware.info
Resumen: We typically test the more expensive and advanced all-in-ones, but there are some interesting models out there that cost no more than . Hardware.Info tested five of them. A fairly complete all-in-one doesn't have to cost you hundreds of . If you keep ...
60mm touchscreen with touch buttons, AirPrint and Android App support, Good running costs for budget printer
Messy paper stop design, Awkward memory card slot, Paper tray restricted to 80 sheets
HP's Photosmart 5520 continues the success of its predecessor, but adds in faster mobile print and duplex printing. It's easy to use, quick to print, reasonably compact – though the paper supports are messy – and comparatively inexpensive to run. It's a g...
