Testseek.es han recogido 4 las revisiones expertas de el Lava E Tab Z7H 7 inch y el grado medio es el 65%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Lava E Tab Z7H 7 inch.
(65%)
4 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
6501004
Críticas
página 1 de 1
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
Publicación: 2013-05-06, Autor: Tablets , crítica de: tablets-help.com
Good display resolution, External 3G USB Dongle connectivity
Less battery power, Lack of Bluetooth, Low processor power
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2013-01-07, Autor: Laique , crítica de: techmagnifier.com
Affordable, Excellent video quality, Decent camera quality, Huge internal space
No SIM, Does not support 3G, Lacks Bluetooth
Sporting a trendy design, this stylish tab comes at an affordable price. Though it comes with good spec sheet, still when most of the tablets are coming with in-built 3G and supports SIM, ETAB Z7H Plus might go through hardships to attain sales rate. Our ...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(40%)
Publicación: 2012-09-28, Autor: Francis , crítica de: firstpost.com
It was a great experience testing the LAVA E Tab and using it for a while. The lack of an HDMI port did not seem to put us off as one would not use the HDMI that often. The rugged build quality, the neat finish of the tablet, the excellent speaker audio...
Publicación: 2012-08-31, Autor: Techmagnifier , crítica de: techmagnifier.com
1GHz Cortex A8 processor, 7inch 800 x 480 TFT LCD capacitive touch screen, 4GB internal memory, 512 MB RAM, Expandable up to 32GB via microSD card, Connectivity WiFi, 3G USB dongle (select models), Android v4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich) OS, Builtin VGA camer
No Bluetooth, Below average inbuilt camera
The Lava E-Tab Z7H Review tells us that although it's not excellent, it can be considered as a fairly good tablet available at a low price tag. The gadget has been incorporated with alluring display, Ice Cream Sandwich OS and cost-effective price. However...
