es.testseek.com  

 
 
Buscar:   
 

Inicio » Ordenadores » Unidades » AMD » AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



En proceso
Por favor, espere...

  Críticas de expertos    

Reviews of AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.es han recogido 49 las revisiones expertas de el AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus y el grado medio es el 69%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD FX-4100 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(69%)
49 Críticas
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
69 0 100 49

 

Críticas

página 1 de 5
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
 
  Publicación: 2012-02-23, crítica de: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Resumen:  Following our sub-£160 gaming CPU comparison, we put Intel's Core i3-2100 and AMD's FX-4100 under the microscope. This time, we test a number of different graphics cards from AMD to see how GPUs affect perceived processor bottlenecks. At the end of Jan...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2011-12-01, crítica de: techradar.com

  • Cutting edge AMD architecture on the cheap, You might be able to unlock the extra modules
  • Weak per-core performance, Not a great gaming chip
  • Cut down versions of a top chip usually make a lot of sense. This time, not so much...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
(70%)
 
  Publicación: 2013-03-25, crítica de: ixbtlabs.com

  • Resumen:  We've already reviewed the top processor of AMD's Vishera family, FX-8350. That was just the beginning of the big refresh for the Socket AM3+ platform. AMD has also rolled out a number of more affordable CPUs. Today we're going to cover them in compari...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2013-03-07, crítica de: ixbtlabs.com

  • Resumen:  Today we'll focus on a pair of AMD's Trinity-based budget processors. Our summer review proved the FM1-based Athlon II X4 processors to be quite good. Now we're going to see if their counterparts can keep up. Testbeds Though the lowest-end FM1-based At...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2012-12-23, crítica de: tomshardware.com

  • Resumen:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2012-01-25, crítica de: ixbtlabs.com

  • Resumen:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2011-12-15, crítica de: xbitlabs.com

  • Two months ago when we tested the top desktop Bulldozer processor, we concluded that it turned out a big disappointment. The results of our today’s FX series testing, including lower-cost CPU modifications, didn’t change out opinion. Processors on Bul...

 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2011-11-08, Autor: Nathan , crítica de: legitreviews.com

  • The AMD FX-4100 didn't top the charts when it comes to CPU performance, but the low price and solid overclocking results make it a decent chip for those looking for a budget system build....

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2011-11-07, Autor: Carl , crítica de: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
 
  Publicación: 2011-10-19, crítica de: phoronix.com

  • Resumen:  The NAS Parallel Benchmarks from NASA were mixed, but generally the i3-2120 managed to outperform the FX-4100. CLOMP is used for measuring the OpenMP efficiency on multiple CPU cores. The FX-4100 did quite poorly for being a quad-core part and ev...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
    página 1 de 5 « Anterior   1 2 3 4 5   Siguiente »  
 
Los productos más populares de la misma categoría