Testseek.es han recogido 266 las revisiones expertas de el AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus y el grado medio es el 79%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(93%)
2719 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
790100266
A los editores les gusta
Excelente rendimient
Gran potencial y funciones especiales para overcloc
Estética muy cuidad
Bios sumamente complet
Placa de sonido SupremeFXIII integrad
Si desea opinar acerca de esta artícul
Clickee Aquí
Gran cantidad de núcleos
Opciones totalmente desbloqueadas
Excelente rendimiento
Tanto en juegos como en tareas multihilo
Soporte nativo para memorias 1866MHz
Puede alcanzar facilmente frecuencias superiores a 4
5Ghz
Excelente relación Precio/Rendim
Precio en torno a los 200 euros
Buen comportamiento térmico
El coste total de un equipo es reducido si se eligen bien los componentes
Relación precio/rendimiento excelente
Multiplicador desbloqueado
Es totalmente compatible con placas base AM3
A los editores no les gusta
Posición y forma de los puntos de medición de voltajes.
Gran consumo al hacer overclocking
Rendimiento equivalente a un cuatro núcleos de Intel
A pesar de tener ocho
Y con un TDP notablemente mayor que se refleja en el consumo de energía
Publicación: 2013-07-04, Autor: Koen , crítica de: uk.hardware.info
Resumen: Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...
Resumen: On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2013-04-08, Autor: James , crítica de: micromart.co.uk
Resumen: AMD's Piledriver line (which succeeds Bulldozer) has been attempting to pull back ground from Intel since its release, primarily through aggressive discounts. One of the few AMD chips that can even start to compete on performance grounds is this, the eigh...
Resumen: AMD and Intel continue serving up increasingly faster CPUs. But graphics card performance is accelerating even faster. Is there still such a thing as processor-bound gaming? We take two Radeon HD 7970s, high-end desktop CPUs, and a few games to find ou...
The AMD FX-8350 CPU improves company's standing against Intel but doesn't rewrite the rules of the game....
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(60%)
Publicación: 2012-11-28, Autor: Koen , crítica de: uk.hardware.info
Resumen: Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-11-08, Autor: Dave , crítica de: techradar.com
Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
Premio
-
Publicación: 2012-10-23, Autor: Koen , crítica de: uk.hardware.info
Resumen: The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-10-23, Autor: Tarinder , crítica de: HEXUS.net
Resumen: It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...
