Testseek.es han recogido 266 las revisiones expertas de el AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus y el grado medio es el 79%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(93%)
2719 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
790100266
A los editores les gusta
Excelente rendimient
Gran potencial y funciones especiales para overcloc
Estética muy cuidad
Bios sumamente complet
Placa de sonido SupremeFXIII integrad
Si desea opinar acerca de esta artícul
Clickee Aquí
Gran cantidad de núcleos
Opciones totalmente desbloqueadas
Excelente rendimiento
Tanto en juegos como en tareas multihilo
Soporte nativo para memorias 1866MHz
Puede alcanzar facilmente frecuencias superiores a 4
5Ghz
Excelente relación Precio/Rendim
Precio en torno a los 200 euros
Buen comportamiento térmico
El coste total de un equipo es reducido si se eligen bien los componentes
Relación precio/rendimiento excelente
Multiplicador desbloqueado
Es totalmente compatible con placas base AM3
A los editores no les gusta
Posición y forma de los puntos de medición de voltajes.
Gran consumo al hacer overclocking
Rendimiento equivalente a un cuatro núcleos de Intel
A pesar de tener ocho
Y con un TDP notablemente mayor que se refleja en el consumo de energía
Publicación: 2012-11-29, Autor: hokiealumnus , crítica de: overclockers.com
So, what have we learned? Objectively, when looking at our entire benchmarking and gaming suite, the FX-8350 is priced right where it should be. Let's start with a reminder of price. As configured, the two systems here are $220 apart, or 16.7%. As menti...
Does, the AMD FX-8350, flagship of the new AMD FX range, mark AMD’s return to form? There has been much progress since the launch of the FX-8150, though it has to be said that this isn’t saying all that much. In terms of performance first of all, there...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-11-22, Autor: Shawn , crítica de: tweaktown.com
Resumen: We take a look at the Trinity based A10-5800K and Vishera FX-8350 processors from AMD and see how they do in terms of all important performance....
The FX-8350 is faster across the board than the FX-8150 but like its predecessor, it's hampered by uninspiring single-threaded performance and crummy energy efficiency. In both regards, there's a lot of ground to make up if AMD want to catch Intel. Sa...
AMD has done a lot to improve the FX-8350 considering the lack of usual CPU architecture improvements. With no change in die size, TDP or production process, its managed to squeeze up to 15 per cent more performance out of this chip, all whilst lowering p...
Resumen: The AMD FX-8350 has a slight performance-per-Watt advantage over the FX-8150 when running OpenSSL. Through a wide variety of benchmarks, the average system power consumption for the AMD FX-8350 in the system with the ASUS Crosshair V Formula mother...
Publicación: 2012-10-25, Autor: Hilbert , crítica de: guru3d.com
Resumen: AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processors performance analyzedAMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor. And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been relea...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-10-23, Autor: Anand , crítica de: anandtech.com
Resumen: Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Look...
Resumen: Bulldozer is the word. Ok, perhaps it is not “the” word, but it is “a” word. When AMD let that little codename slip some years back, AMD enthusiasts and tech journalists started to salivate about the possibilities. Here was a unique and very new...
