Testseek.es han recogido 266 las revisiones expertas de el AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus y el grado medio es el 79%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
July 2015
(79%)
266 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
(93%)
2719 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
790100266
A los editores les gusta
Excelente rendimient
Gran potencial y funciones especiales para overcloc
Estética muy cuidad
Bios sumamente complet
Placa de sonido SupremeFXIII integrad
Si desea opinar acerca de esta artícul
Clickee Aquí
Gran cantidad de núcleos
Opciones totalmente desbloqueadas
Excelente rendimiento
Tanto en juegos como en tareas multihilo
Soporte nativo para memorias 1866MHz
Puede alcanzar facilmente frecuencias superiores a 4
5Ghz
Excelente relación Precio/Rendim
Precio en torno a los 200 euros
Buen comportamiento térmico
El coste total de un equipo es reducido si se eligen bien los componentes
Relación precio/rendimiento excelente
Multiplicador desbloqueado
Es totalmente compatible con placas base AM3
A los editores no les gusta
Posición y forma de los puntos de medición de voltajes.
Gran consumo al hacer overclocking
Rendimiento equivalente a un cuatro núcleos de Intel
A pesar de tener ocho
Y con un TDP notablemente mayor que se refleja en el consumo de energía
Resumen: Today, AMD is releasing its second-generation of FX CPUs, dubbed “Vishera.” The FX-8350 is currently the highest-end model available, running at 4 GHz and costing USD 195. Let’s see how it fares against its main competitor, the Core i5-3470 (3.2 GHz, U...
This is one of those occasions where AMD has done their job well, but we can’t really celebrate quite yet. The new flagship AMD FX-8350 “Vishera” definitively takes the title of champion amongst AMD processors. The Phenom II 1100T 6-core CPU can’t even...
Publicación: 2012-10-22, Autor: Victor , crítica de: Bjorn3d.com
Piledriver is what Bulldozer should have been in the first place. The FX-8350 puts AMD back on track, but not yet back in the game. If it were not for Intel's exceptional high IPC and performance per watts ratio on Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge, AMD's Vishera/P...
Publicación: 2012-10-22, Autor: Scott , crítica de: Techreport.com
You've probably gathered that the FX-8350 improves on its Bulldozer-based precursor pretty handily for a chip that's neither a die shrink nor an all-new architecture. The final verdict on the FX-8350 isn't terribly difficult to render, but it does have s...
While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-10-22, Autor: Dan , crítica de: legitreviews.com
The AMD FX-8350 has a number of strong points that make it a great choice for your computer. If you're looking to upgrade from an older system you really can't beat the price to performance ratio offered with an eight core 4GHz processor processor fo...
Back then, a year ago, when we first met the desktop Zambezi processors, it already felt like AMD Bulldozer didn’t really end up in a good spot. We can’t say that AMD’s microarchitecture is flawed. On the contrary, it is very interesting and is capabl...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2012-10-22, Autor: Chris , crítica de: tomshardware.com
We ran her through the twisties. We did the drag racing. We measured her mileage. We even popped her hood to figure out what makes this little speedster tick. In every way, today's FX-8350 is better than the FX-8150 that preceded it. Faster. More efficien...
Excellent affordability versus computing power, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Improved "Per Clock" performance, Compatible with existing AM3+ products
Same maximum TDP as previous products, Perhaps a bit late to the market. It still uses 32nm while Intel is on 22nm, Higher power consumption than Intel products, "Low" but adequate single-threaded performance will not appeal to some
What can I say? AMD has priced these new FX-8350 CPUs in such a way that there is no doubt: they make an attractive alternative to their Intel counterparts, and AMD seems focused on keeping that price difference no matter what. AMD can't take Intel ove...
