Testseek.es han recogido 50 las revisiones expertas de el Philips 298P4QJEB y el grado medio es el 86%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Philips 298P4QJEB.
October 2013
(86%)
50 Críticas
Puntuación media de los expertos que han realizado una crítica del producto.
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
Puntuación media de los propietarios del producto.
86010050
A los editores les gusta
Pantalla ultra panorámica con resolución 2560 x 1080
Pantalla ultra panorámica con resolución 2560 x 1080, Gran calidad de imagen con colores profundos, Base muy estable y con una gran ergonomía, Soporte VESA, Gran variedad de entradas de vídeo, Controles fáciles de utilizar y OSD muy intuitivo, Software mu
Precio (unos 500 euros)
Si bien este Philips Crystalclear 298P4 se sitúa en una posición bastante elevada en cuanto a precio en el mercado de monitores ultra panorámicos (cuesta unos 500 euros), creemos que si vas a realizar una inversión en un monitor de estas característica
Publicación: 2015-04-27, Autor: Diogo , crítica de: showmetech.com.br
Qualidade da imagem, Ajuste da altura (suporte prático), Várias conexões de vídeo, Ângulo de visão bastante amplo
Distorção da imagem no modo MultiView
Um monitor ultrawide, realmente, pode facilitar o trabalho de muita gente que precisa manipular dados ou imagens na tela do computador. Seja para jogos, filmes ou atividades que exijam muita resolução, o monitor Brilliance UltraWide 219 (298P4QJEB) não va...
Publicación: 2015-05-22, Autor: Chris , crítica de: ergohacks.com
So how to sum the 298P4QJEB Philips Widescreen monitor up? I asked Lily's PA how she would sum it up and she went with “Awesome!” and I've got to agree. To someone who has never used one regularly widescreen monitors feel odd and possibly a little stretch...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
-
Publicación: 2014-05-04, Autor: Terry , crítica de: pcgameware.co.uk
The Philips 298P4QJEB 29″ 21:9 SuperWide monitor was very easy to set up and the stand was so adjustable that you would be hard pressed to have a situation where you couldn't position it exactly where you wanted it. The Ultra widescreen format of the pan...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
Premio
(90%)
Publicación: 2014-02-12, Autor: David , crítica de: uk.hardware.info
Resumen: 2013 will be known as the year when PC monitors finally started moving beyond Full HD resolution. Last year we tested a large number of WQHD monitors with 2560x1440 pixels, and today we will examine nine screens with a resolution of 2560x1080. The as...
Wide viewing angles, Plenty of video connections, Good contrast (1150:1), Excellent colour fidelity after changing a few settings (Delta E = 1.6), Practical stand, Fourport USB hub
Not responsive enough for gaming, Upscaling function for Full HD sources doesn't work very well, Price
Publicación: 2013-05-01, Autor: Duncan , crítica de: techadvisor.co.uk
Something of a niche product with a specific, custom resolution but it looks very stylish and on its own merit, certainly a high quality, impressive piece of wide-screen kit. If you like to run lots of apps at once, it provides an excellent way of working...
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?
(80%)
Publicación: 2013-04-30, Autor: Duncan , crítica de: macworld.co.uk
Extremely wide 21:9 display, high quality, great viewing angles, AH-IPS technology, stylish looking, robust and flexible stand, good performance.
Requires specific custom resolution, hefty price tag, not very quick refresh rates or contrast ratios, large footprint.
Something of a niche product with a specific, custom resolution but it looks very stylish and on its own merit, certainly a high quality, impressive piece of wide-screen kit. If you like to run lots of apps at once, it provides an excellent way of working...
Publicación: 2013-04-09, Autor: Tarinder , crítica de: HEXUS.net
Quality looks, Aboveaverage image quality, Good choice of inputs, Excellent for gaming, Versatile stand
Significant price premium, Tinny speakers
Most PC users needn't spend more than £150 on a 22-24in, well-specified, high-quality monitor with a native resolution of 1,920x1,080 pixels. Go significantly beyond this outlay and there are two main options: a 27in display with a high-resolution 2,560x...
