es.testseek.com  

 
 
Buscar:   
 

Inicio » Vehículo » Coches » Sedan » Volvo S60 Sedan 2016



En proceso
Por favor, espere...

  Críticas de expertos    

Reviews of Volvo S60 Sedan 2016

Testseek.es han recogido 4 las revisiones expertas de el Volvo S60 Sedan 2016 y el grado medio es el 78%. Enrolle abajo y vea todas las revisiones para Volvo S60 Sedan 2016.
 
(78%)
4 Críticas
Usuarios
-
0 Críticas
78 0 100 4

 

Críticas

página 1 de 1
Ordenar por:
Puntuación
 
  Publicación: 2017-01-16, crítica de: motortrend.com

  • Great performance and handling, Impressive fuel economy in front-drive models, The limited-edition Polestar variant is a rarity,
  • The new four-cylinder engines don't sound that good, Interior space is on the small side, Polestar models have more road noise than most Volvos
  • Despite its age, the 2016 S60 remains a great choice for those who don't use their rear seats too much. In a 2015 S60 T6 Drive-E First Test review, we said that the new super- and turbocharged I-4 provides plenty of power and a sizable fuel economy improv...

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publicación: 2016-03-04, Autor: D.Colman , crítica de: carreview.com

  • Beautifully Crafted, Ultra Comfortable Interior,
  • Unwieldy Suspension, Poorly Indexed Owner's Manual

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
(80%)
 
  Publicación: 2015-12-05, Autor: Emme , crítica de: cnet.com

  • The 2016 Volvo S60 T5 Inscription adds more room for rear seat passengers, while a set of driver assistance features, such as adaptive cruise control, takes some of the stress out of parking and traffic
  • The infotainment system is difficult to navigate and often demands that you take your eyes off the road. Bland exterior styling will not appeal to those who want a character-driven car
  • The cushy ride and adaptive cruise control make the Volvo S60 T5 best for those that have long commutes in heavy traffic...

 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
(75%)
 
  Publicación: 2015-08-14, crítica de: edmunds.com

  • Muscular and fuel-efficient turbocharged engines, Well-balanced ride and handling, Excellent safety scores
  • Fuel efficiency drops on all-wheel-drive models, Standard wheelbase has less rear legroom than competitors

Leer toda la crítica »
 
¿Le ha sido de ayuda esta crítica?   
 
-
    página 1 de 1  
 
Los productos más populares de la misma categoría